All sites Cumulo · investment lab
Guide

PEA or brokerage account: the honest maths

On paper the PEA wins: 17.2 % against 30 %. In practice the answer depends on three things — your horizon, what you want to buy, and how much you intend to put in.

A general summary, not investment advice. This page concerns a French tax resident, as an individual. Allowances, special cases and legislative changes are not all modelled.

The tax gap, in figures

In an ordinary brokerage account (compte-titres, or CTO), a capital gain bears the single flat-rate levy: 30 %, made up of 12.8 % income tax and 17.2 % social contributions.

In a PEA older than five years, the income tax portion disappears. Only the 17.2 % of social contributions remains. That is a 12.8-point gap on the gain — and it compounds too, since it applies to capital that was never eaten into.

On a gain ofBrokerage (30 %)PEA > 5 years (17.2 %)Difference
€10,000€7,000€8,280+ €1,280
€50,000€35,000€41,400+ €6,400
€150,000€105,000€124,200+ €19,200

Amounts kept after tax. The gap is far from symbolic: on a €150,000 gain it represents close to two years of median salary.

The PEA's three constraints

1. Five years. The tax advantage is only secured after five years of holding the plan. A withdrawal before that point generally closes the plan and forfeits the favourable regime. The clock starts at opening, not at the first contribution: opening a PEA with a few hundred euros, even without a settled strategy, starts the clock. It is probably the most profitable decision a French saver can make in ten minutes.

2. A €150,000 cap. It applies to contributions, not to the plan's value: a fully funded PEA can be worth far more without any problem. Beyond the cap, a brokerage account takes over — the two wrappers complement each other more than they compete.

3. A universe restricted to European equities. This is the least well understood constraint, because it is largely worked around. Some ETFs held inside a PEA track non-European indices — the S&P 500, the MSCI World, emerging markets — through synthetic replication: the fund holds a basket of European shares and swaps its performance for that of the target index, under a contract with a bank. The economic exposure is the index's; PEA eligibility is preserved.

The price of synthesis. A synthetic ETF adds a dependency on the soundness of the swap counterparty, and its ongoing charges are often slightly higher than its physical equivalent. In practice the fee gap is comfortably outweighed by the 12.8 points of tax saved — but it is not free, and you should know it.

When the brokerage account is still the right choice

The PEA is not superior in every circumstance. The brokerage account keeps four clear advantages.

  • No cap, and no minimum holding period.
  • The whole investable universe: individual shares outside Europe, bonds, commodities, physically replicated ETFs on any index.
  • Offsetting losses against gains in the same year and the following ten — a mechanism the PEA does not have.
  • Full liquidity: withdrawing part of it affects nothing else.

The most common set-up is therefore not "one or the other" but one then the other: a PEA opened early and filled first, a brokerage account beyond the cap or for whatever the PEA cannot hold.

And life insurance?

France's third wrapper, often mentioned in the same breath. After eight years it applies 7.5 % income tax after an annual allowance — €4,600 for a single person — plus 17.2 % social contributions, so roughly 24.7 % before the allowance, and appreciably less once it is taken into account.

It therefore sits between the PEA and the brokerage account on tax, with two differences in kind: annual management fees that weigh on performance year after year, and a distinctive inheritance treatment that is its real argument. Comparing life insurance to a PEA on the tax rate alone misses the point.

Put numbers on your situation

Cumulo's calculator covers all three French regimes: brokerage account at 30 %, PEA older than five years at 17.2 %, life insurance older than eight years. Select France, pick the wrapper, and compare the net capital over your real horizon.

Compare PEA and brokerage account

Frequently asked questions

Is a PEA always better than a brokerage account?

On tax, yes, after five years: 17.2 % of social contributions against the 30 % flat-rate levy. But the PEA caps contributions at €150,000, restricts you to European equities and does not allow losses to be offset. For a large portfolio or non-eligible assets, a brokerage account remains essential.

Can you buy an S&P 500 or MSCI World ETF inside a PEA?

Yes, through synthetically replicated ETFs: the fund holds a basket of European shares and swaps its performance for that of the target index. The economic exposure is that of the S&P 500 or MSCI World while PEA eligibility is preserved. In exchange, these funds add a dependency on the swap counterparty.

What happens if I withdraw money before five years?

A withdrawal before the plan's fifth anniversary generally closes it and forfeits the favourable tax regime. That is why it is common to open a PEA very early with a token amount: the clock runs from the opening date, not from the first significant investment.

Does the €150,000 cap apply to the PEA's value?

No, only to total contributions. A PEA funded to €150,000 can be worth €400,000 with no consequence: the valuation is not capped, only the money paid in.

Do I have to choose between a PEA and a brokerage account?

Rarely. The most common approach is to fill the PEA first for its tax advantage, then use a brokerage account beyond the cap or for assets the PEA cannot hold. The two wrappers are complementary.

Read next